pypi package report

Is feast safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

// reach

157 direct dependencies

51 carry known advisories, worst CRITICAL

6 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.


cvss
9.9
critical

CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10

epss
1.1%
medium

chance of exploitation in 30 days, 65th percentile of all CVEs

xyz score
4.7
medium

CyberXYZ composite out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-gg2p-37pv-v7fq, the advisory selected below

// 4 advisories

GHSA-gg2p-37pv-v7fq

CRITICALGitHub ratingCVE-2026-18948

A flaw was found in Feast. The system improperly deserializes user-defined functions (UDFs) stored in its registry, which are serialized using the 'dill' library. This allows a remote attacker to store a malicious UDF, leading to unauthenticated arbitrary code execution on the feature server in default configurations. An authenticated attacker can also achieve arbitrary code execution on the registry server by bypassing authorization checks during deserialization. This vulnerability can result in cross-tenant data access and lateral movement within the system.

// cvss v3.1 vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Checked 2026-11-06 at 22:10 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-08-10. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.