pypi package report

Is couchbase safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity CRITICAL.

// reach

3 direct dependencies

1 carry known advisories, worst MEDIUM

14 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

  • agno
  • autogen
Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.


cvss
9.8
critical

CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10

epss
0.84%
medium

chance of exploitation in 30 days, 58th percentile of all CVEs

xyz score
4.8
medium

CyberXYZ composite out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-9266-j9v3-q4j5, the advisory selected below

// 1 advisories

GHSA-9266-j9v3-q4j5

CRITICALGitHub ratingCVE-2022-32563

An issue was discovered in Couchbase Sync Gateway 3.x before 3.0.2. Admin credentials are not verified when using X.509 client-certificate authentication from Sync Gateway to Couchbase Server. When Sync Gateway is configured to authenticate with Couchbase Server using X.509 client certificates, the admin credentials provided to the Admin REST API are ignored, resulting in privilege escalation for unauthenticated users. The Public REST API is not impacted by this issue. A workaround is to replace X.509 certificate based authentication with Username and Password authentication inside the bootstrap configuration.

// cvss v3.1 vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Checked 2026-11-06 at 20:55 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-06-11. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.