pypi package report

Is drf-jwt safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity CRITICAL.

// reach

3 direct dependencies

3 carry known advisories, worst CRITICAL

1 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.


cvss
9.1
critical

CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10

epss
1.6%
medium

chance of exploitation in 30 days, 76th percentile of all CVEs

xyz score
4.6
medium

CyberXYZ composite out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-fpjm-rp2g-3r4c, the advisory selected below

// 1 advisories

GHSA-fpjm-rp2g-3r4c

CRITICALGitHub ratingCVE-2020-10594

An issue was discovered in drf-jwt 1.15.x before 1.15.1. It allows attackers with access to a notionally invalidated token to obtain a new, working token via the refresh endpoint, because the blacklist protection mechanism is incompatible with the token-refresh feature. NOTE: drf-jwt is a fork of jpadilla/django-rest-framework-jwt, which is unmaintained.

// cvss v3.1 vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Checked 2026-11-06 at 22:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2020-06-05. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.