pypi package report

Is django safe?

160 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

// reach

5 direct dependencies

1 carry known advisories, worst HIGH

471 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.


cvss
9.1
critical

CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10

epss
19.3%
high

chance of exploitation in 30 days, 97th percentile of all CVEs

xyz score
6.7
medium

CyberXYZ composite, a working exploit is published

fig. 01 — GHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr, the advisory selected below

// 160 advisories

GHSA-frmv-pr5f-9mcr

CRITICALGitHub ratingCVE-2025-64459

An issue was discovered in 5.1 before 5.1.14, 4.2 before 4.2.26, and 5.2 before 5.2.8. The methods QuerySet.filter(), QuerySet.exclude(), and QuerySet.get(), and the class Q(), are subject to SQL injection when using a suitably crafted dictionary, with dictionary expansion, as the _connector argument. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank cyberstan for reporting this issue.

// cvss v3.1 vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Checked 2026-11-06 at 21:15 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-08-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.