pypi package report

Is docling safe?

8 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.70%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-cjqg-rq2h-2fvj, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-cjqg-rq2h-2fvj

HIGHCVE-2026-44017

In versions < 2.91.0, The EasyOCR model download functionality extracted ZIP archives without validating member paths, enabling Zip Slip attacks. If an attacker could compromise the model download source (via supply chain attack, DNS spoofing, or MITM), they could write arbitrary files to any location writable by the process, potentially achieving:

Affected
< 2.91.0
Fixed in
2.91.0
Weakness
CWE-22
Published
2026-06-03
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

1 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-03. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is docling safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ