pypi package report

Is django-anymail safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.2%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.7

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-qh9x-mc42-vg4g, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-qh9x-mc42-vg4g

CRITICALCVE-2018-1000089

Anymail django-anymail version version 0.2 through 1.3 contains a CWE-532, CWE-209 vulnerability in WEBHOOKAUTHORIZATION setting value that can result in An attacker with access to error logs could fabricate email tracking events. This attack appear to be exploitable via If you have exposed your Django error reports, an attacker could discover your ANYMAILWEBHOOK setting and use this to post fabri

Affected
>= 0.2, < 1.4
Fixed in
1.4
Weakness
CWE-532
Published
2022-05-14
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

10 direct, 5 carrying known advisories, worst CRITICAL

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:47 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-14. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is django-anymail safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ