pypi package report

Is channels safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

10 direct dependencies

3 carry known advisories, worst CRITICAL

9 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.


cvss
7.4
high

CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10

epss
2.7%
medium

chance of exploitation in 30 days, 86th percentile of all CVEs

xyz score
4.2
medium

CyberXYZ composite out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-v542-8q9x-cffc, the advisory selected below

// 1 advisories

GHSA-v542-8q9x-cffc

HIGHGitHub ratingCVE-2020-35681

Django Channels 3.x before 3.0.3 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information from a different request scope. The legacy channels.http.AsgiHandler class, used for handling HTTP type requests in an ASGI environment prior to Django 3.0, did not correctly separate request scopes in Channels 3.0. In many cases this would result in a crash but, with correct timing, responses could be sent to the wrong client, resulting in potential leakage of session identifiers and other sensitive data. Note that this affects only the legacy Channels provided class, and not Django's similar ASGIHandler, available from Django 3.0.

// cvss v3.1 vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:H

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Checked 2026-11-06 at 21:59 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-03-19. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.