npm package report

Is @babel/core safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

cvss
3.2

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.10%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.2

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-4x5r-pxfx-6jf8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-4x5r-pxfx-6jf8

LOWCVE-2026-49356

Using @babel/core to compile maliciously crafted code can allow ab attacker to read any source map from the system that is running Babel, if these conditions are all true:

Affected
>=8.0.0-alpha.0, <8.0.0-rc.6, >= 8.0.0-alpha.0, < 8.0.0-rc.5
Fixed in
8.0.0-rc.6
Weakness
CWE-200
Published
2026-06-15
Source
osv

NVDMITREOSV


// dependencies

25 direct, 7 carrying known advisories, worst CRITICAL

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:27 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is @babel/core safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ