npm package report

Is @babel/traverse safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss

9.4

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

5.5

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-67hx-6x53-jw92, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-67hx-6x53-jw92

CRITICALCVE-2023-45133

Using Babel to compile code that was specifically crafted by an attacker can lead to arbitrary code execution during compilation, when using plugins that rely on the path.evaluate()or path.evaluateTruthy() internal Babel methods.

Affected: < 7.23.2, >= 8.0.0-alpha.0, < 8.0.0-alpha.4
Fixed in: 7.23.2
Weakness: CWE-184
Published: 2023-10-16
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference reference reference reference reference reference reference

// dependencies

15 direct, 2 carrying known advisories, worst CRITICAL

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so npm packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:52 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-10-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @babel/traverse safe? npm package security report | CyberXYZ