rubygems package report

Is sfpagent safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
2.2%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vm28-mrm7-fpjq, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vm28-mrm7-fpjq

HIGHCVE-2014-2888

lib/sfpagent/bsig.rb in the sfpagent gem before 0.4.15 for Ruby allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the module name in a JSON request.

Affected
< 0.4.15
Fixed in
0.4.15
Weakness
CWE-77
Published
2017-10-24
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so rubygems packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:39 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2017-10-24. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is sfpagent safe? rubygems package security report | CyberXYZ