rubygems package report

Is rubocop safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

cvss
2.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
1.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-wmjf-jpjj-9f3j, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-wmjf-jpjj-9f3j

LOWCVE-2017-8418

RuboCop 0.48.1 and earlier does not use /tmp in safe way, allowing local users to exploit this to tamper with cache files belonging to other users.

Affected
< 0.49.0
Fixed in
0.49.0
Weakness
CWE-668
Published
2017-11-15
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so rubygems packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:46 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2017-11-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is rubocop safe? rubygems package security report | CyberXYZ