rubygems package report

Is reel safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.3%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-x3v4-pxvm-63j8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-x3v4-pxvm-63j8

HIGHCVE-2020-7659

reel through 0.6.1 allows Request Smuggling attacks due to incorrect Content-Length and Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible to conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks by sending the Content-Length header twice. Furthermore, invalid Transfer Encoding headers were found to be parsed as valid which could be leveraged for TECL smuggling attacks. Note, This project is deprecated, and is not

Affected
<= 0.6.1
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-444
Published
2021-05-24
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so rubygems packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:47 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-05-24. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is reel safe? rubygems package security report | CyberXYZ