rubygems package report

Is pitchfork safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
4.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.30%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-pfqj-w6r6-g86v, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-pfqj-w6r6-g86v

MODERATECVE-2025-30221

HTTP Response Header Injection in Pitchfork Versions < 0.11.0 when used in conjunction with Rack 3

Affected
< 0.11.0
Fixed in
0.11.0
Weakness
CWE-113
Published
2025-03-27
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so rubygems packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:41 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-03-27. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is pitchfork safe? rubygems package security report | CyberXYZ