rubygems package report

Is clockwork_web safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
6.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-p4xx-w6fr-c4w9, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-p4xx-w6fr-c4w9

MODERATECVE-2023-25015

Clockwork Web before 0.1.2, when used with Rails before 5.2 is used, allows Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF). A CSRF attack works by getting an authorized user to visit a malicious website and then performing requests on behalf of the user. In this instance, actions include enabling and disabling jobs. All users running an affected release on Rails < 5.2 should upgrade immediately.

Affected
< 0.1.2
Fixed in
0.1.2
Weakness
CWE-352
Published
2023-02-02
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so rubygems packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:40 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-02-02. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is clockwork_web safe? rubygems package security report | CyberXYZ