rubygems package report

Is actionmailer safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MEDIUM.

cvss
6.6

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.90%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-h47h-mwp9-c6q6, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-h47h-mwp9-c6q6

MEDIUMCVE-2024-47889

There is a possible ReDoS vulnerability in the blockformat helper in Action Mailer. This vulnerability has been assigned the CVE identifier CVE-2024-47889.

Affected
>=3.0.0, <6.1.8, >=7.0.0, <7.0.9, >=7.1.0, <7.1.4, >=7.2.0, <7.2.2
Fixed in
7.0.8.5
Weakness
CWE-1333
Published
2024-10-15
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so rubygems packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:47 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-10-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is actionmailer safe? rubygems package security report | CyberXYZ