weasyprint (pypi) has 5 known vulnerabilities, the worst rated HIGH. No single fixed version is recorded that clears every advisory, so check each one below. No malicious-package signal is recorded.
No published models are known to use this package.
CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10
chance of exploitation in 30 days, 61st percentile of all CVEs
CyberXYZ composite out of 10
fig. 01 — GHSA-r543-q48m-4c9j, the advisory selected below
This was found during a pentest, funded by the NLNnet foundation, conducted by Stefan Vink from Radically Open Security and the only High issue found.
Full advisory text at GitHub advisory or NVD.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CyberXYZ does not call a package safe in absolute terms. It records 5 known vulnerabilities for weasyprint (pypi), the worst rated HIGH, and no malicious-package signal. Whether it is acceptable depends on the version you run.
Yes. CyberXYZ records 5 known vulnerabilities for weasyprint (pypi), the worst rated HIGH. They are GHSA-r543-q48m-4c9j, GHSA-983w-rhvv-gwmv, GHSA-35jj-wx47-4w8r, GHSA-jf6q-chmf-3h3v, GHSA-jhhc-3hcp-qhm5.
Search weasyprint in CyberXYZ Check at https://cyberxyz.io/check?q=weasyprint. The xyz Scanner checks a project's dependencies, and CyberXYZ Proxy checks each package as it is installed.
Checked 2026-11-14 at 12:54 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-10-07. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.