pypi package report

Is trapster safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-mxwc-wh95-pw4g, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-mxwc-wh95-pw4g

MODERATE

trapster.libs.dns.decodelabels() decodes DNS names from attacker-supplied UDP packets and recurses once per RFC 1035 compression pointer with no cycle detection and no depth bound. A single unauthenticated UDP datagram sent to the DNS honeypot drives the function past CPython's recursion limit, raising RecursionError. That exception is not handled anywhere on the datagramreceived path, so it escap

Affected
<= 1.2.0
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-674
Published
2026-07-08
Source
github

GHSAreference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:37 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-07-08. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is trapster safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ