pypi package report

Is python-multipart safe?

9 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.7

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-5rvq-cxj2-64vf, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-5rvq-cxj2-64vf

HIGHCVE-2026-53539

When parsing application/x-www-form-urlencoded bodies, QuerystringParser located the field separator with a two step lookup: it first scanned the entire remaining buffer for &, and only when no & existed anywhere ahead did it fall back to scanning for ;. For a body that uses ; as the separator and contains no &, every field iteration performed a full failed & scan over the entire remaining buffer

Affected
< 0.0.30
Fixed in
0.0.30
Weakness
CWE-400
Published
2026-06-15
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference

// dependencies

1 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:31 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is python-multipart safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ