pypi package report

Is pymupdf safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    56 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

    Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
    // ai models

    1 published models carry an advisory from this package

    0 pin a version the advisory is confirmed against; the rest declare it without a version.

    interfaze-ai/interfaze-1-liteMEDIUMnot pinned

    1 published models

    1 declared · 1 observed · 0 inferred

    ModelEvidence
    interfaze-ai/interfaze-1-liteobserved

    1 published AI models are associated with this package: 1 name it in a requirements or pyproject file, 1 load it or import it directly, and 0 are inferred from the runtime stack their declared library pulls in. Only 1 state a version requirement, so this is not a count of affected models.


    cvss
    0.0
    high

    severity out of 10

    epss
    0.00%
    medium

    chance of exploitation in 30 days, 34th percentile of all CVEs

    xyz score
    not scored

    CyberXYZ composite out of 10

    fig. 01 — GHSA-cxqh-p2w9-fmr7, the advisory selected below

    // 1 advisories

    GHSA-cxqh-p2w9-fmr7

    MODERATECVE-2026-3029

    A path traversal and arbitrary file write vulnerability exist in the embedded get function in 'main.py' in PyMuPDF version, 1.26.5.

    // cvss v3.1 vector

    CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

    Attack vector
    Network
    Attack complexity
    Low
    Privileges required
    None
    User interaction
    None
    Scope
    Unchanged
    Confidentiality
    None
    Integrity
    None
    Availability
    High

    Checked 2026-10-16 at 00:13 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-19. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

    Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.