pypi package report

Is pydicom safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

7 direct dependencies

2 carry known advisories, worst CRITICAL

24 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.


cvss
7.8
high

CVSS v3.1 base score out of 10

epss
0.29%
low

chance of exploitation in 30 days, 22nd percentile of all CVEs

xyz score
4.2
medium

CyberXYZ composite out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-v856-2rf8-9f28, the advisory selected below

// 1 advisories

GHSA-v856-2rf8-9f28

HIGHGitHub ratingCVE-2026-32711
// summary

A crafted DICOMDIR can set ReferencedFileID to a path outside the File-set root. pydicom resolves the path only to confirm that it exists, but does not verify that the resolved path remains under the File-set root. Subsequent public FileSet operations such as copy(), write(), and remove()+write(use_existing=True) use that unchecked path in file I/O operations. This allows arbitrary file read/copy and, in some flows, move/delete outside the File-set root.

// details

Verified on pydicom 3.1.0.dev0.

Relevant logic is in src/pydicom/fileset.py:

  • RecordNode._file_id converts ReferencedFileID directly to Path(...)
  • FileSet.load() checks only (root / file_id).resolve(strict=True) to confirm existence
  • FileSet.load() does not verify that the final resolved path is contained within the File-set root
  • FileInstance.path returns self.file_set.path / self.node._file_id
  • FileSet.copy() uses shutil.copyfile(instance.path, dst)
  • FileSet.write() uses Path(instance.path).unlink() and shutil.move(...)

Because there is no containment check such as resolved.relative_to(root.resolve(strict=True)), a malicious DICOMDIR can reference:

  • absolute paths such as /etc/passwd
  • traversal paths such as ../...
  • syntactically conformant file IDs that escape via symlinks

This is not limited to obviously invalid VR input. Even when pydicom emits warnings for invalid ReferencedFileID values, the operation is not blocked. I also confirmed a symlink-based variant using a conformant file ID.

A realistic server-side scenario is:

  • a user uploads a DICOM File-set zip
  • the server loads the uploaded DICOMDIR using FileSet
  • the server re-exports or reorganizes the File-set using FileSet.copy() or FileSet.write()
  • a server-local file referenced by the malicious DICOMDIR is included in the exported result
// poc

Minimal reproduction:

  • Copy a sample File-set that contains a valid DICOMDIR
  • Modify one DirectoryRecordSequence item so that ReferencedFileID = "/etc/passwd" (or /tmp/secret.txt)
  • Load it with FileSet(ds) or FileSet(path_to_dicomdir)
  • Call FileSet.copy(new_root)
  • Observe that the exported File-set contains the contents of the referenced external file

Example:

from pathlib import Path
from tempfile import mkdtemp
import shutil
from pydicom import dcmread
from pydicom.fileset import FileSet

base = Path("src/pydicom/data/test_files/dicomdirtests")
root = Path(mkdtemp(prefix="fsroot_"))
out = Path(mkdtemp(prefix="fsout_"))

shutil.copy2(base / "DICOMDIR", root / "DICOMDIR")
for d in ("77654033", "98892003", "98892001"):
    shutil.copytree(base / d, root / d)

ds = dcmread(root / "DICOMDIR")
item = next(x for x in ds.DirectoryRecordSequence if "ReferencedFileID" in x)
item.ReferencedFileID = "/etc/passwd"

fs = FileSet(ds)
fs.copy(out)

I also verified the issue in a simple web import/export demo where an uploaded malicious File-set caused /etc/passwd to be copied into the exported result.

If useful, I can provide the exact malicious sample and the demo environment separately.

// impact

This is a path traversal / root containment bypass in FileSet handling.

Observed impact:

arbitrary file read/copy outside the File-set root via FileSet.copy() arbitrary file move outside the File-set root via FileSet.write() arbitrary file delete outside the File-set root via FileSet.remove(...); write(use_existing=True) Affected applications are those that accept untrusted DICOMDIR / File-set input and then call public FileSet workflows such as load(), copy(), write(), or remove().

A realistic impact is server-side file disclosure in import/export workflows.

// cvss v3.1 vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack vector
Local
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Checked 2026-11-06 at 23:20 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-20. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.