pypi package reportIs pycryptodome safe?
2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.
// reach0 direct dependencies
none carry a known advisory
149 packages depend on it
an advisory here reaches each of them
// ai model usageNo published models are known to use this package.
cvssCVSS v3.1 base score out of 10; GitHub rates it HIGH
epsschance of exploitation in 30 days, 50th percentile of all CVEs
xyz scoreCyberXYZ composite out of 10
fig. 01 — GHSA-j225-cvw7-qrx7, the advisory selected below
// 2 advisories
PyCryptodome and pycryptodomex before 3.19.1 allow side-channel leakage for OAEP decryption, exploitable for a Manger attack.
// cvss v3.1 vectorCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
- Attack vector
- Network
- Attack complexity
- High
- Privileges required
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Checked 2026-11-06 at 21:59 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-01-05. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.