pypi package report

Is oslo-messaging safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

22 direct dependencies

4 carry known advisories, worst CRITICAL

6 packages depend on it

an advisory here reaches each of them

Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.


cvss
0.0
high

severity out of 10

epss
0.00%
low

chance of exploitation in 30 days, 20th percentile of all CVEs

xyz score
0.0
medium

CyberXYZ composite out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-76qh-xr7q-h39m, the advisory selected below

// 1 advisories

GHSA-76qh-xr7q-h39m

HIGHCVE-2026-44393

An issue was discovered in OpenStack oslo.messaging 1.0.0 through 17.3.0. The oslo.messaging RabbitMQ driver does not perform TLS hostname verification when connecting to the message broker. When sslcafile is configured, the driver enables certificate chain validation but does not pass the expected broker hostname into the underlying TLS stack. Any certificate signed by the deployment CA is accepted regardless of hostname, allowing an attacker who can intercept control-plane traffic to impersonate the RabbitMQ broker and perform a man-in-the-middle attack on RPC and notification traffic. All OpenStack services using oslo.messaging with RabbitMQ over TLS are affected.

// cvss v3.1 vector

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Checked 2026-10-23 at 18:51 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.