pypi package report

Is org.codehaus.xfire:xfire-core safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.80%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-5jc8-8xhv-g8qm, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-5jc8-8xhv-g8qm

HIGHCVE-2012-5817

Codehaus XFire 1.2.6 and earlier, as used in the Amazon EC2 API Tools Java library and other products, does not verify that the server hostname matches a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) or subjectAltName field of the X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL servers via an arbitrary valid certificate.

Affected
<= 1.2.6
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-20
Published
2022-05-17
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:45 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is org.codehaus.xfire:xfire-core safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ