pypi package report

Is github.com/go-vela/types safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7v38-w32m-wx4m, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7v38-w32m-wx4m

UNKNOWN

Vela pipelines can use variable substitution combined with insensitive fields like parameters, image and entrypoint to inject secrets into a plugin/image and — by using common substitution string manipulation — can bypass log masking and expose secrets without the use of the commands block. This unexpected behavior primarily impacts secrets restricted by the "no commands" option. This can lead to

Affected
>=0, <0.23.2
Fixed in
0.23.2
Published
2024-03-15
Source
github

GHSA

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-03-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is github.com/go-vela/types safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ