pypi package report

Is github.com/crewjam/saml safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.5

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-5mqj-xc49-246p, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-5mqj-xc49-246p

HIGHCVE-2023-28119

Our use of flate.NewReader does not limit the size of the input. The user could pass more than 1 MB of data in the HTTP request to the processing functions, which will be decompressed server-side using the Deflate algorithm. Therefore, after repeating the same request multiple times, it is possible to achieve a reliable crash since the operating system kills the process.

Affected
>=0, <0.4.13
Fixed in
0.4.13
Published
2023-03-22
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE


// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:41 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-03-22. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is github.com/crewjam/saml safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ