pypi package report

Is extractor safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss

5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

8.9%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-f836-7jqw-3684, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-f836-7jqw-3684

MODERATECVE-2006-2458

Multiple heap-based buffer overflows in Libextractor 0.5.13 and earlier allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) the asfreadheader function in the ASF plugin (plugins/asfextractor.c), and (2) the parsetrakatom function in the QT plugin (plugins/qtextractor.c).

Affected: = 0.5
Fixed in: not stated
Published: 2022-05-01
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference reference reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-01. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is extractor safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ