pypi package report

Is duplicity safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-wxcw-rqxc-hj85, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-wxcw-rqxc-hj85

MODERATECVE-2007-5201

The FTP backend for Duplicity before 0.4.9 sends the password as a command line argument when calling ncftp, which might allow local users to read the password by listing the process and its arguments.

Affected
< 0.4.9
Fixed in
0.4.9
Weakness
CWE-200
Published
2022-05-01
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// dependencies

29 direct, 13 carrying known advisories, worst CRITICAL

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-01. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is duplicity safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ