pypi package report

Is definitions safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss

7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

3.5%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-v4x4-98cg-wr4g, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-v4x4-98cg-wr4g

HIGHCVE-2018-20325

There is a vulnerability in load() method in definitions/parser.py in the Danijar Hafner definitions package for Python. It can execute arbitrary python commands resulting in command execution.

Affected: <= 0.2.0
Fixed in: not stated
Weakness: CWE-94
Published: 2018-12-26
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:45 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2018-12-26. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is definitions safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ