pypi package report

Is collective.dms.basecontent safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
3.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-r48c-4vfj-h426, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-r48c-4vfj-h426

MODERATECVE-2022-4495

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in collective.dms.basecontent. This issue affects the function renderCell of the file src/collective/dms/basecontent/browser/column.py. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 1.7 or later will address this issue. The patch is at commit 6c4d616fcc771822a14ebae5e23

Affected
< 1.7
Fixed in
1.7
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2022-12-14
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:45 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-12-14. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is collective.dms.basecontent safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ