pypi package report

Is arrayfire safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.7%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-69fv-gw6g-8ccg, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-69fv-gw6g-8ccg

UNKNOWNCVE-2018-20998

The attribute repr() added to enums to be compatible with C-FFI caused memory corruption on MSVC toolchain.

Affected
>=3.5.1-0, <3.6.0
Fixed in
3.6.0
Weakness
CWE-119
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:34 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-08-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is arrayfire safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ