pypi package report

Is aptdaemon safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
4.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-wpmr-q825-x4c6, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-wpmr-q825-x4c6

MODERATECVE-2020-15703

There is no input validation on the Locale property in an apt transaction. An unprivileged user can supply a full path to a writable directory, which lets aptd read a file as root. Having a symlink in place results in an error message if the file exists, and no error otherwise. This way an unprivileged user can check for the existence of any files on the system as root.

Affected
< 1.1.1
Fixed in
1.1.1
Weakness
CWE-200
Published
2022-05-24
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:41 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-24. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is aptdaemon safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ