pypi package report

Is CairoSVG safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-f38f-5xpm-9r7c, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-f38f-5xpm-9r7c

HIGHCVE-2026-31899

Kozea/CairoSVG (~300K downloads/week) has exponential denial of service via recursive <use> element amplification in cairosvg/defs.py (line ~335). This causes CPU exhaustion from a small input.

Affected
<= 2.8.2
Fixed in
2.9.0
Weakness
CWE-400
Published
2026-03-13
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// ai model usage

3 published models

0 declared · 3 observed · 0 inferred

ModelEvidence
jinaai/jina-embeddings-v5-omni-nanoobserved
jinaai/jina-embeddings-v5-omni-smallobserved

Sign in to see all 1 models and per-model risk

3 published AI models are associated with this package: 0 name it in a requirements or pyproject file, 3 load it or import it directly, and 0 are inferred from the runtime stack their declared library pulls in. Only 0 state a version requirement, so this is not a count of affected models.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-13. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is CairoSVG safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ