pypi package report

Is @solid/identity-token-verifier safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss

not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-xmh9-rg6f-j3mr, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-xmh9-rg6f-j3mr

UNKNOWN

Any Pod on a Solid server using a vulnerable version of the identity-token-verifier library is at risk of a spoofed Demonstration of Proof-of-Possession (DPoP) token binding. This vulnerability could give total and complete access to a targeted Pod.

Affected: >=0, <0.5.2
Fixed in: not stated
Weakness: CWE-290
Published: 2021-03-12
Source: osv

OSV

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

No published models are known to use this package.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:45 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-03-12. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is @solid/identity-token-verifier safe? pypi package security report | CyberXYZ