packagist package report

Is wnx/laravel-backup-restore safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.90%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-w9mx-xmg4-gc4r, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-w9mx-xmg4-gc4r

HIGHCVE-2026-53932

A crafted backup archive can trigger OS command injection during database restore. The restore workflow extracts a ZIP archive, enumerates files under db-dumps, converts the dump path to an absolute path, and passes that path into database import commands that are built as shell command strings.

Affected
<= 1.9.3
Fixed in
1.9.4
Weakness
CWE-77
Published
2026-07-09
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:55 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-07-09. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is wnx/laravel-backup-restore safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ