packagist package report

Is winter/wn-backend-module safe?

15 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss

10.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.50%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-pgpf-m8m4-6cg6, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-pgpf-m8m4-6cg6

CRITICALCVE-2026-27591

Affected versions of Winter CMS allowed authenticated backend users to escalate their accounts level of access to the system by modifying the roles / permissions assigned to their account through specially crafted requests to the backend while logged in.

Affected: >= 1.2.0, < 1.2.12
Fixed in: 1.2.12
Weakness: CWE-284
Published: 2026-03-12
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-08-20. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is winter/wn-backend-module safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ