GHSA-3prj-6hqw-cm82
HIGHWhen a JWE uses a password-based key-encryption algorithm (PBES2-HS256+A128KW, PBES2-HS384+A192KW, PBES2-HS512+A256KW), PBES2AESKW::unwrapKey() reads the p2c (PBKDF2 iteration count) parameter directly from the attacker-controlled JOSE header and passes it to hashpbkdf2() with no upper bound. The only validation performed (checkHeaderAdditionalParameters()) was isint($p2c) && $p2c > 0.
An unauthenticated attacker can craft a single JWE whose protected header sets a very large p2c (e.g. 100000000 ≈ 87 s of CPU, or PHPINTMAX), forcing a worker to spend an arbitrary amount of CPU inside PBKDF2 before the key unwrap can even fail. The decrypter swallows the eventual exception, so the attacker pays almost nothing while the server burns CPU. JSON General serialization (multiple recipients) and multi-key JWKSets multiply the cost. This is a classic uncontrolled-resource-consumption (CWE-400) denial of service.
// affected configurationsApplications that register any PBES2-HS+AKW algorithm in their decryption AlgorithmManager.
// patchesPBES2AESKW now enforces a configurable maximum iteration count (DEFAULTMAXCOUNT = 1000000, well above realistic legitimate values which are a few thousand) in checkHeaderAdditionalParameters(), before any PBKDF2 computation. The bound is exposed as a constructor argument so operators can tune it.
// workaroundsBefore upgrading: validate/limit the p2c header with a custom header checker, or do not enable PBES2 algorithms for untrusted tokens.
// references- RFC 7518 §4.8 (PBES2)
- CWE-400: Uncontrolled Resource Consumption
Un correctif a été préparé sur une branche dédiée basée sur 3.4.x, avec des tests anti-régression dédiés (fork privé temporaire de cette advisory, PR #1).
PBES2 — PBES2AESKW::unwrapKey() borne désormais le paramètre p2c (constante DEFAULTMAXCOUNT = 1000000, configurable via le constructeur) avant tout appel à hashpbkdf2(), empêchant l'amplification CPU (DoS).
Validation : php -l OK, PHPUnit vert, aucune nouvelle erreur PHPStan introduite (différentiel nul vs 3.4.x), aucun commentaire ajouté dans le code source. Après merge, cascade prévue 3.4.x → 4.0.x → 4.1.x.