packagist package report

Is web-token/jwt-bundle safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      high

      severity band, no base score published

      epss
      not scored

      chance of exploitation in 30 days

      xyz score
      not scored

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-jc38-x7x8-2xc8, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      GHSA-jc38-x7x8-2xc8

      HIGH
      // summary

      JWSVerifier::getAlgorithm() in src/Library/Signature/JWSVerifier.php (line 144) merges protected and unprotected headers using PHP's spread operator:

      $completeHeader = [...$signature->getProtectedHeader(), ...$signature->getHeader()];

      In PHP, when spreading arrays with duplicate string keys, the last array's values take precedence. Since the unprotected header (getHeader()) is spread second, an attacker can override the integrity-protected alg parameter by placing a different value in the unprotected header.

      This creates a Time-of-Check/Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) vulnerability:

      • HeaderCheckerManager validates alg from the protected header
      • JWSVerifier uses alg from the unprotected header for actual verification

      The same issue exists in JWEDecrypter.php (lines 120-124) where arraymerge() exhibits the same last-wins behavior for alg and enc.

      // affected code

      JWSVerifier.php line 144 — Spread operator merge order allows unprotected header to override alg:

      $completeHeader = [...$signature->getProtectedHeader(), ...$signature->getHeader()];

      JWEDecrypter.php lines 120-124 — arraymerge() with same last-wins behavior:

      $completeHeader = array_merge(
          $jwe->getSharedProtectedHeader(),
          $jwe->getSharedHeader(),
          $recipient->getHeader()
      );
      // vector a — mixed key sets (high probability)

      If the application uses a JWKSet containing keys of different types (common in multi-tenant or federation scenarios), the JWSVerifier iterates all keys (line 86). An attacker can force a different algorithm that matches a different key in the set.

      // vector b — alg only in unprotected header (high probability)

      If alg is placed EXCLUSIVELY in the unprotected header (not in the protected header at all), HeaderCheckerManager::checkDuplicatedHeaderParameters() does NOT trigger. The JSON Flattened/General serializers allow tokens with no protected header or a protected header without alg. RFC 7515 Section 4.1.1 states alg MUST be integrity-protected, but the library does not enforce this.

      // vector c — direct jwsverifier usage (high probability)

      JWSLoader takes ?HeaderCheckerManager (nullable). If developers use JWSVerifier directly or create JWSLoader without a HeaderCheckerManager, the duplicate header check never runs.

      // contrast with jwsbuilder (safe)

      JWSBuilder::findSignatureAlgorithm() (line 196) uses [...$header, ...$protectedHeader] where protected wins. It also has checkDuplicatedHeaderParameters() (line 218). The JWSVerifier has neither safeguard.

      // proof of concept
       "RS256", "typ" => "JWT"];
      $unprotected = ["alg" => "HS256"];
      $merged = [...$protected, ...$unprotected];
      // $merged["alg"] === "HS256" — unprotected wins!
      
      // JSON Flattened JWS with algorithm override:
      $maliciousJws = json_encode([
          'payload' => base64url_encode($payload),
          'protected' => base64url_encode('{"alg":"RS256"}'),
          'header' => ['alg' => 'HS256'],  // OVERRIDE
          'signature' => base64url_encode($sig),
      ]);
      // HeaderCheckerManager validates RS256 from protected header -> PASS
      // JWSVerifier uses HS256 from unprotected header -> attacker's algorithm choice

      A full working PoC demonstrating HS512-to-HS256 downgrade with mixed keysets is available upon request.

      // suggested fix

      In JWSVerifier::getAlgorithm(), read alg exclusively from the protected header:

      private function getAlgorithm(Signature $signature): Algorithm
      {
          $protectedHeader = $signature->getProtectedHeader();
          if (! isset($protectedHeader['alg'])) {
              throw new InvalidArgumentException('The "alg" parameter must be in the protected header.');
          }
          return $this->signatureAlgorithmManager->get($protectedHeader['alg']);
      }

      For JWEDecrypter, reverse the merge order so protected header wins, or extract alg/enc exclusively from the protected header.

      // résolution

      Un correctif a été préparé sur une branche dédiée basée sur 3.4.x, avec des tests anti-régression dédiés (fork privé temporaire de cette advisory, PR #1).

      JWS algorithm confusion — JWSVerifier lit le paramètre alg exclusivement dans le header protégé en intégrité (RFC 7515 §4.1.1) ; un alg placé dans le header non protégé ne peut plus surcharger l'algorithme signé.

      Validation : php -l OK, PHPUnit vert, aucune nouvelle erreur PHPStan introduite (différentiel nul vs 3.4.x), aucun commentaire ajouté dans le code source. Après merge, cascade prévue 3.4.x → 4.0.x → 4.1.x.


      Checked 2026-09-26 at 01:01 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-18. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.