packagist package report

Is typo3/html-sanitizer safe?

6 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-p5j5-4j3q-8mq8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-p5j5-4j3q-8mq8

MODERATECVE-2026-47345

Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

Affected
< 2.3.2
Fixed in
2.3.2
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2026-06-12
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:51 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-12. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is typo3/html-sanitizer safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ