packagist package report

Is simplesamlphp/xml-security safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
8.2

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.10%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-r353-4845-pr5p

HIGHCVE-2026-32600

XML nodes encrypted with either aes-128-gcm, aes-192-gcm, or aes-256-gcm lack validation of the authentication tag length.

Affected
>= 2.0.0, < 2.3.1
Fixed in
2.3.1
Weakness
CWE-354
Published
2026-03-13
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:36 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-03-13. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is simplesamlphp/xml-security safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ