packagist package report

Is neos/swiftmailer safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-rq6q-hjvh-5mwh, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-rq6q-hjvh-5mwh

CRITICAL

A remote code execution vulnerability has been found in the Swift Mailer library (swiftmailer/swiftmailer) recently. [See this advisory for details](http://legalhackers.com/advisories/SwiftMailer-Exploit-Remote-Code-Exec-CVE-2016-10074-Vuln.html). If you are not using the default mail() transport, this particular problem does not affect you. Upgrading is of course still recommended!

Affected
< 5.4.5
Fixed in
5.4.5
Published
2024-05-17
Source
github

GHSAreferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:49 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-05-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is neos/swiftmailer safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ