packagist package report

Is lightsaml/lightsaml safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.

      cvss
      0.0
      high

      severity band, no base score published

      epss
      0.00%
      medium

      chance of exploitation in 30 days, 68th percentile of all CVEs

      xyz score
      0.0
      low

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-vg4f-8v9q-5c3x, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      GHSA-vg4f-8v9q-5c3x

      HIGHCVE-2018-1000165

      LightSAML version prior to 1.3.5 contains a Incorrect Access Control vulnerability in signature validation in readers in src/LightSaml/Model/XmlDSig/ that can result in impersonation of any user from Identity Provider. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 1.3.5 and later.

      // cvss v3.0 vector

      CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

      Attack vector
      Network
      Attack complexity
      Low
      Privileges required
      None
      User interaction
      None
      Scope
      Unchanged
      Confidentiality
      None
      Integrity
      High
      Availability
      None

      Checked 2026-10-04 at 01:14 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-13. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.