packagist package report

Is lara-zeus/artemis safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss

6.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-c6cw-g7fc-4gwc, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-c6cw-g7fc-4gwc

MODERATECVE-2024-47817

If values passed to a paragraph widget are not valid and contain a specific set of characters, applications are vulnerable to XSS attack against a user who opens a page on which a paragraph widget is rendered.

Affected: >= 1.0.0, <= 1.0.6
Fixed in: 1.0.7
Weakness: CWE-79
Published: 2024-10-07
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:54 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-10-07. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is lara-zeus/artemis safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ