packagist package report

Is laminas/laminas-form safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
6.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-jq4p-mq33-w375, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-jq4p-mq33-w375

MODERATECVE-2022-23598

When rendering validation error messages via the formElementErrors() view helper shipped with laminas-form, many messages will contain the submitted value. However, in vulnerable versions of laminas-form, the value was not being escaped for HTML contexts, which can potentially lead to a Reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attack.

Affected
< 2.17.1, >= 3.1.0, < 3.1.1, >= 3.0.0, < 3.0.2
Fixed in
2.17.1
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2022-01-28
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:52 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-01-28. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is laminas/laminas-form safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ