packagist package report

Is craftcms/cms safe?

126 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-wg23-69c2-gjc8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-wg23-69c2-gjc8

CRITICAL

Craft CMS passkey login accepts WebAuthn requestOptions from the unauthenticated login request body and does not persist the updated credential counter returned by the WebAuthn assertion validator. A captured passkey login request body can therefore be replayed because the old challenge is accepted again, and the stored credential counter remains stale.

Affected
>= 5.0.0-RC1, < 5.10.5
Fixed in
5.10.5
Weakness
CWE-294
Published
2026-08-07
Source
github

GHSAreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-08-07. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is craftcms/cms safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ