packagist package report

Is contao/core safe?

9 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-wxxw-5gq6-j2g5, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-wxxw-5gq6-j2g5

CRITICAL

contao/core versions 2.x prior to 2.11.17 and 3.x prior to 3.2.9 are vulnerable to arbitrary code execution on the server due to insufficient input validation. In fact, attackers can remove or change pathconfig.php by entering a URL, meaning that the entire Contao installation will no longer be accessible or malicious code can be executed.

Affected
>= 3.0.0, < 3.2.9, >= 2.0.0, < 2.11.17
Fixed in
3.2.9
Published
2024-05-15
Source
github

GHSAreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:45 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-05-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is contao/core safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ