packagist package report

Is codingms/additional-tca safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-rrh3-cgmx-w62f, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-rrh3-cgmx-w62f

MODERATECVE-2025-30083

A cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been discovered in the Additional TCA extension. This vulnerabily is exploitable by a logged in backend user utilizing the TYPO3 backend user interface. This user can create output in the HTML context by exploiting improperly encoded user input. Updates 1.15.17 and 1.16.9 are available for download.

Affected
>= 1.16.0, < 1.16.9, >= 1.7.0, < 1.15.17
Fixed in
1.16.9
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2025-03-19
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 03:29 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-03-19. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is codingms/additional-tca safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ