packagist package report

Is b13/seo_basics safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

cvss
2.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.8%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
1.1

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7p53-8wjr-j8h4, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7p53-8wjr-j8h4

LOWCVE-2012-5888

Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Basic SEO Features (seobasics) extension before 0.8.2 for TYPO3 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors.

Affected
< 0.8.2
Fixed in
0.8.2
Weakness
CWE-79
Published
2022-05-17
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so packagist packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-05-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is b13/seo_basics safe? packagist package security report | CyberXYZ