nuget package report

Is parc safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-xwxc-j97j-84gf, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-xwxc-j97j-84gf

UNKNOWN

In the affected versions of this crate, LockWeak<T> unconditionally implemented Send with no trait bounds on T. LockWeak<T> doesn't own T and only provides &T. This allows concurrent access to a non-Sync T, which can cause undefined behavior like data races.

Affected
>=0
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-119
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSA


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so nuget packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-08-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is parc safe? nuget package security report | CyberXYZ