nuget package report

Is hashbrown safe?

2 known vulnerabilities.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-wwq9-3cpr-mm53, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-wwq9-3cpr-mm53

UNKNOWN

The borsh serialization of the HashMap did not follow the borsh specification. It potentially produced non-canonical encodings dependent on insertion order. It also did not perform canonicty checks on decoding.

Affected
>=0.15.0, <0.15.1
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-502
Published
2024-12-04
Source
osv

OSV

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so nuget packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-12-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is hashbrown safe? nuget package security report | CyberXYZ