nuget package report

Is github.com/foxcpp/maddy safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-4g76-w3xw-2x6w, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-4g76-w3xw-2x6w

CRITICALCVE-2023-27582

maddy 0.2.0 - 0.6.2 allows a full authentication bypass if SASL authorization username is specified when using the PLAIN authentication mechanisms. Instead of validating the specified authorization username, it is accepted as is after checking the credentials for the authentication username.

Affected
>=0.2.0, <0.6.3
Fixed in
0.6.3
Published
2023-03-14
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so nuget packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:28 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-03-14. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is github.com/foxcpp/maddy safe? nuget package security report | CyberXYZ